GPU residual value as loan collateral
constraint a named mechanism, not a conclusion
More than $20bn of debt is collateralised by NVIDIA GPUs, and every such structure rests on the assumption that the chips hold value over 5-6 years. H100 rental rates fell from $7-10/hr in early 2024 to $2-4/hr by late 2025. Falling residuals tighten advance rates and refinancing terms, which gates the buildout through the financing channel rather than the physical one.
The path
| node | effect |
|---|---|
| CoreWeave, Inc. | -1.00 |
| Lambda, Inc. | -1.00 |
| Neocloud / AI-Datacenter Buildout | -1.00 |
| Crusoe Energy Systems | -0.55 |
| Hyperscaler | -0.25 |
| NVIDIA Corporation | +0.80 |
coverage
Scored on 6 subjects: 5 bound by it, 1 own the scarce thing and are made more valuable by it. Severity is graded by hand against a stated scale, not computed — the sign here is a judgement, and the magnitude is that grade.
Arguments about this mechanism
None yet. No thesis names this mechanism’s subject, which is a gap in the bank rather than a fact about the mechanism.
Arguments that run through it
These name a node on the path rather than the subject, so they pass through this mechanism without being about it. Shown separately and never graded as claims about it — hubs above the graph’s own 90th-percentile degree are excluded, or every argument touching NVIDIA would attach to every mechanism NVIDIA touches.